About Me

Name: Christianomics
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Freddoso Gets it Right

David Freddoso of National Review Online gets it right when discussing global warming, which is in stark contrast to most of the overly conclusive discussion one sees on the issue.
When looking at a phenomenon of global magnitude, it is necessary to gather large amounts of data on numerous related factors in order to put any hypothesis on a sound scientific footing.  The purported "majority of scientists" who are frequently said to agree that humanity and specifically industry is the source of a recent, slight rise in average global temperature, is in fact highly likely to have been deeply influenced in that conclusion by the specific designation of large amounts of research funding (jobs, food for scientists families) to study "global warming."  Note that the subject is not "global temperature data" but is, rather "global warming." 
Now is it logical to suppose that a scientist who disproves the popular theory will long have a job in that sponsored research area?

Almost no public figure has bothered to look beyond the hyped anti-capitalist position that man causes warming of our planet.  While a greater concentration of certain gases in the atmosphere can cause increased absorption of energy from the sun's rays, there is little support for the notion  that mankind's contribution is significant.  There is also little support for the notion that even stopping all burning of anything worldwide would have any moderating effect on the warming trend.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

China Inflation a sign of the Times

China's inflation has recently hit a two year high, following on India's big inflation problem in  May with the rising Rupee.   The trend is that the large overseas economies which used to simply absorb the increases by the Federal Reserve in the US money supply, are now running out of capacity to do that.  Now Keynesian economists out there will say that such spending is necessary for the good of our economy, and a part of the abolition of scarcity in our time, but those who recognize that you can never get something for nothing will take a different view.
There appears to be inflation over the horizon, and it's coming our way.  While we can continue to benefit from vast and rapidly growing trade with China and India, we can no longer rely on workers there to absorb continuous cost reductions to keep US prices stable.  US price stability is going to become more and more dependent upon a contraction of the money supply and a corresponding increase in the quality of future investment.  A contracting money supply will induce companies to clean up bad investments brought on by recent artificially low borrowing costs, and will allow the efficiency of US companies to show through in decreasing costs of production.  A general rise in US prices may still occur, but allowing the market to adjust by means of accurate signals sent by sound money is the best medicine the market could ever get.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Christianomic View

A Christianomic view requires one to take account of the Word of God while addressing the scarcities of resources we see all around us.  Often it seems that discussions of issues we all face on a daily basis fail to account for the fact that all resources are limited.

The Wall Street Journal (link) tends to fail to account for the lack of economic thinking by the general audience, and by the way fails to account for the logical fallacies inherent in Keynesian economics.

The National Review Online (NRO) tends to fail to account for the fact that all conservatives don't think alike, and that you can be conservative for many different reasons. 

The tendency to become intellectually complacent and feel that all right thinking people must agree with the obviousness of one's argument needs to be assiduously avoided if one actually intends to persuade, so Yours Truly will attempt to do so.

The tendency of most decision making to be fearfully shortsighted also needs to be pointed out, as Thomas Sowell has continuously said for many years (Knowledge and Decisions).    
Also, arguments displaying the tendency to confuse meanings, manipulate by appeal to emotion, and embrace attractive but false propositions needs to be carefully deconstructed and rebuilt on sound logical foundations.

It will take some serious effort, but I think a Christian worldview based on reality and logic can be clearly expounded here on Townhall.  I hope this vision comes true, and I hope all you readers come and enjoy the ride.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »